|
ALI'S ADVENTURES
After the Battle of
the Mergers
Follow the adventures of Ali,
as she uses a new approach to understand and manage the cultural
differences between two parts of an organisation, that have recently
merged.
Introduction
Following a long and arduous battle, Alis organisation has finally
managed to take over its main competitor. Shortly after the merger is
complete, Ali has been given the task of managing the complete development
of the first product to be launched by the New Organisation. This
involves taking the best resources from both of the old organisations and
making them work together as a unified team, producing a joint product.
One of the problems Ali faces is to
get the teams from the New Partners to work effectively with her
Old Team. Ali does not wish to impose her original organisations
way of working on the New Partners, because this will cause unnecessary
friction and stifle the creativity necessary for this important project.
Working Apart
At the start of the work, the project teams still hold allegiance to their
old organisations. This appears to be causing noticeable difficulties.
During an early review meeting, Ali finds progress is behind schedule, and
slipping further. In addition, discussions in the meeting are taking
longer than expected, with teams accusing the others of deliberately
causing delays and administrative difficulties. Ali suspects that the
problems concerning the way the teams work are related to the old
organisations structures and methods.
Ali talks with the team managers from
the New Partners to find out more about the way they work and manage. All
her suspicions appear to be true, there are distinct differences in the
way the New Partners manage their work and run their projects. Worse, the
New Partners are not happy with the way Alis Old Team is working,
providing Ali with a few unexpected home truths.
Now Ali knows the project has
problems, due to differences in the way the New Partners work with the Old
Team. This discovery then poses a number of questions, including:
-
Are the differences really
significant ?
-
Are there any more that we have
not yet identified ?
-
Will they effect the successes of
the project ?
-
Do these problems effect the whole
of the new organisation?
-
What can Ali do about them ?
Later, Ali takes the concerns and
juggles them into a table, which looks a bit like Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Project differences
|
Old
Teams Perception of the New Partners
|
New
Partners Perception of the Old Team
|
|
They
are behind schedule with their work
|
We
are always trying to push things along too quickly
|
|
They
are never punctual
|
|
|
They
always have to refer decisions to their managers, who will not
attend the meetings
|
We
have too much individual authority
|
|
They
want detailed discussions on minor details. They always need more
data
|
We
are not always aware of the detailed procedures to be used
|
|
They
appear to forget, or changed, some of the items formally agreed at
previous meetings
|
We
keep to the letter of the agreements, not the spirit
|
|
|
We
are disrupting the harmony of the new organisation
|
To Alis surprise, not many of the
differences are directly related to the outcome of the project. Most of
them appear to be concerned with the administration and control methods
used. However, some of the differences also appear to be similar, just
taking a different perspective. Others are management related problems,
associated with the way the origins of the organisations.
Understanding Differences
Ali considers there is a need to understand more about the differences
in ways of working. This will allow all her teams to become more aware of
each others working methods, helping to improve the integration of the two
organisations. Ali discusses this aspect during the next meeting and the
team managers agree the need to improve the way the new organisation works
and the need to resolve differences between the groups.
Ali also realises that there is a need
to permanently resolve these differences. Otherwise they will keep
effecting the way the new organisation works, as well as disrupting
Alis project. Ali considers that the only way to do this fairly is to
systematically investigate the differences that are currently appearing in
her project, as well as possible future differences. Once the extent of
the differences is known, Ali can find the most suitable solution to
resolve them.
After making a few enquiries, Ali
selects a systematic approach, which can identify the most significant
differences and their impact, Spectra Analysis from Migrators Consulting
(Ref 1). Spectra Analysis provides a 5 step framework to identify and
resolve any differences. The principle steps from the framework are shown
in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Spectra Analysis
|
Spectra
Analysis Steps
|
Objective
|
|
Data
Gathering
|
Obtain
data on the participants management styles and ways of working.
Identify acceptable ways of working for each participant. |
|
Populate
Spectra Charts
|
Provide
a visual indication of similarities and differences in organisation
cultures.
Identify extent of similarities and differences in working methods
of participants. |
|
Resolve
Initial Issues
|
Obtain
early agreement on the most appropriate procedures that can be used.
Agree approaches to mitigating remaining areas of differences. |
|
Communicate
|
Ensure
that all participants are aware of any potential differences.
Publicise agreed procedures and mitigation methods. |
|
Monitoring
& Report
|
Provide
checks to ensure that procedures and mitigation methods are working.
Provide exception reports relating to areas with continuing
difficulties. |
After receiving some initial coaching,
Ali and her team starts to apply the Spectra Analysis framework to the
project and the organisation.
During the Data Gathering step, Ali
obtains a variety of information from the different teams. This is used to
identify the views of each part of the new organisation regarding a number
of areas, or perspectives, relating to work and management. The results
are then plotted on Spectra Charts.
The results revealed the extent of
similarities and differences in the way the various teams within the new
organisation worked. Where the plotting resulted in similar cells being
populated, Ali realises there will probably be no significant differences
in the working methods of the new organisation. However, where the
plotting results in a separation of 2 or more cells, Ali suspects that
there will be significant differences in the working methods of the teams
within the new organisation. If the cell separations are constantly far
apart, Ali knows that the working practices within the new organisation,
will probably need to be re-evaluated.
Working Together
Looking at the Spectra Analysis results and the associated data, Ali
realises that she may not have the best approach in some of the
perspectives. For these perspectives, Ali resolves to change her own
management approach, enabling it to become more flexible and tolerant. Ali
also discuss the differences in the cell plots with the other team
managers. They agree to consider how they can adapt their own team
management and work approaches.
The project team agrees that culture
issues, related to the new organisation, should be included in progress
reports, and discussed at review meetings. The team also agrees that
culture issues should be included on the risk log and the change
management process. The issues, and ways of resolving them, will also be included
in the team briefings. All of which will ensure that any differences in
working between the teams within the new organisation can be highlighted
early, and methods to resolve the issues put in place quickly
The team managers also suggest that
the issues should be raised to the senior management of the new
organisation and included in their progress reports. This will allow all
parts of the new organisation to be aware of the situation, helping to
reduce conflict in other areas.
Return to Ali's
Adventures
introduction
Return to Culture
introduction |